To New Site Or Not To New Site?

Rowany Festival Site Potential Change Process 2013

Dear festival-goers.

As you may know, the Rowany Senate is now some way into the process of deciding whether or not to a) move Rowany Festival to a new location, or b) stay in the current one.

This page will outline the steps involved in this process, where we are currently, and what step(s) follow.

STEP 1) PROPOSALS  (COMPLETE)

We put out a request for tenders for new sites, and that stage in the process has now closed.

Information about the current site, Glenworth Valley, can be found here.

Four sites were proposed for consideration, and they are:

1. Bungendore – Canberra (proposal document found here)
2. Womberoo – Southern Highlands (proposal information web site found here)
3. The Dairy- Western Sydney (proposal document found here)
4. Crossroads – Yass (proposal document found here)

STEP 2) CRITERIA  (COMPLETE)

In early February, the Rowany senate discussed what outcomes we’d like to see for festival, and came up with a set of criteria that we believe a festival site either must have, or would be nice to have. This set of criteria are based on many aspects of our past sites, as well as feedback we have received over the years from yourselves and from the past (and current) festival stewards.

Some are necessities (eg enough land to camp on), some we *could* live without, but are what we’ve come to expect from festival (e.g. fire pits), and some are simply “wouldn’t it be nice if…” (e.g. the ability to erect permanent structures).

Now, to be clear, you should know that Glenworth Valley (for all its pros and cons) basically works as a site for festival. They are happy for us to stay and renew our contract, and we have a good, functional working-relationship with them.

There is no glaring reason for us to leave. We are not being kicked out.

We know that the site does not work for all people, and that some people are not willing or able to come to festival due to the peculiarities of this site. However, we also recognise this will, unfortunately, be true of every site.

Therefore – this whole discussion should take into consideration that we have a fairly respectable bird in the hand right now.

If we are to change site – it will be because we have found a new site that exceeds the current one in what it can do for festival now and in the future.

Keeping this in mind, the process continued:

STEP 3) EXTRA-ORDINARY SENATE DISCUSSION (COMPLETE)

We conducted an extra-ordinary senate meeting on Thursday 21st February at St Peters Town Hall (near Sydenham Station) in Sydney.

The meeting started at 7:30pm and continued until 9.30pm.

This meeting was open to anybody that wished to be part of the discussion. A total of 26 people were in attendance,

At this meeting, we talked about the proposed sites, and how they meet the criteria. Proposers had the opportunity to describe their offering, how it meets the criteria, benefits of their site, and anything else they wished to communicate. Each proposal presentation was followed by questions from the audience which were then answered and discussed.

If you happen to have Facebook access, there is an ongoing conversation in the following Facebook group. You may wish to have a look:

http://www.facebook.com/groups/festivalchat/

(everyone is welcome, just ask to join the group).

AN AUDIO RECORDING IS AVAILABLE

Audio from this meeting was recorded so those who are interested, but were unable to attend, will still have a chance to find out exactly what was discussed.

If you are interested in the recording, THIS IS THE LINK (Size: 50Mb, Format: MP3)

To listen to the recording in your browser, simply click the link above and a new tab / window should open and begin playing the recording (in most modern browsers).

If you want to download the file for playing at your leisure using your favourite media player, you can Right Mouse Click on the link above and choose “Save As” or “Save Link As”  or “Equivalent Save Label” instead.

The quality is not super dooper, we even had some difficulty in hearing live at the meeting due to acoustics of the venue. Additionally, we enjoyed relatively frequent plane traffic overhead. Lastly, 2-4 mins in, required some adjustments to the recording equipment which are a little loud, sorry. All in all though, fairly comprehensible.

STEP 4) SELECT COMMITTEE (COMPLETE)

Following the meeting, a number of anonymous prominent and experienced people (Rowanites as well as representatives from North and South Lochac) shall numerically rate the sites (using a 1-5 scale) according to how much they fit each of the criteria.

Note: the site-raters have already been chosen. To reduce bias, all of those that have submitted a proposed site have been excluded from rating the sites. We’ve also tried to find a variety of people with a great deal of SCA experience behind them.

The ratings will be submitted in the week following the 21st, and the sites will be given a total score based on the aggregate scores from all the rankings – weighted according to how important the criteria are.

STEP 5) (COMPLETE)

The site that has the highest aggregate ranking will be presented to the Baron & Baroness of Rowany, who will have the ultimate decision between it and the current site of Glenworth Valley.

STEP 6) (COMPLETE)

The chosen site will be announced to all and sundry.

And that’s all there is to it.

The final date for renewing the contract at Glenworth Valley is at this coming festival (2013), so that is the final deadline for the decision, but we hope to have the before then.

Thank you for being part of this process, we will keep you informed and this page will be updated as the adventure continues to unfold.

Many thanks,

Rowany Festival

FINAL UPDATE

With the process now concluded, we direct you to the official announcement here.

5 Responses to To New Site Or Not To New Site?

  1. Darren Huett says:

    Hi Guys,
    I was wondering if there has been some sort of discussion within the Barony, or between the Barony and the Kingdom, about the role of Festival as a Kingdom event, hosting Crown on a regular or semi-regular basis?
    If so, what were the results of that discussion/views of the Barony, etc.

    Thanks,

    Hugh

    • Gui says:

      I don’t think there has been any formal discussion.
      Recent changes to the Laws give greater flexibility to the timing of Crown tournament, which gave rise to Crown at Festival in 2011, though due to Easter being a movable feast it probably won’t be again for quite a few years.

      I personally don’t forsee Rowany turning Festival into a Kingdom event for quite some time to come; the regular urgent calls from the Seneschal’s office for Kingdom event bids is a worrying presentiment.

      Regards,
      Sir Gui

    • Torold O Hawkhurst (Torg) says:

      Hello Hugh

      My name is Torold O Hawkhurst known as Torg. I start in 1979 and am a knight 1986 onward and Baron of Rowany 1991 to 1995 inclusive. I have been to all the festivals 1983-2012. Due to being the first group Easter was an obvious choice for a large and long event. Its use by the Barony for festival predates the principality by 7 years or so. Coronet tournaments have been held there as was first Crown of Lochac.

      When Lochac first started as a principality the laws of Lochac said one of the two tournamants had to be held at Festival. That upset some groups and as a result a Prince and Princees gave us 3 reigns a year to avoid Easter for 4 years . That had realy bad problems including a January tournament in our weather and successors who were known the day after the Prince and Princess stepped up.

      Mistress Isabue of the Wild Wood (Lochac senechal) and I discused how the prefered 2 reign a year system would again have a problem with Easter. My suggestion was to space the tournaments 6 months from each other and also the investitures. The tournamant to investiture time should be the minimum practical time and thus was created the Lochac crown event spacing.

      Officially it is a Baronial event and the dates of the Principality and Kingdom events were cunningly set to avoid conflict with Easter which moves around by 6 weeks or so. Having a Crown list at Easter seriously disrupts the timing of the reigns of the King and Queen of Lochac.

      Easter can not be fixed in time and as a result a winner of a tournament then there can have minimal time to arrange things for their reign.

      With massive good will things could be changed but to what end. Rowany having a Crown list every year is not fair and attendance is not in itself enough justification for the change.

      On an irregular basis might be okay especially if Easter runs late in its variable timing. These dates can easily be identified in Advance and approved by the barony and the Kingdom.
      Can be done but not politically easy.

      Torg

  2. Torold O Hawkhurst (Torg) says:

    My opinion of Wambaroo the Southern Highland site is that it is far better than any other site we have ever used. There are more reasons than I can list but infrastructure, size and climate are enough and closeness to Rowany is a bonus.

    Yours in Service Torg o Hawkhurst.

  3. Caterina Contarini says:

    Being an SCA member from QLD, and after reading the pros and cons for all the sites that are being proposed, I feel that Womberoo in the Southern Highlands seems a better site on all counts. I personally would much prefer the colder nights to having to wade through rivers of water at Glenworth whenever it rains over Easter, or in the preceding weeks. I hope, that in view of the potentially lower cost to the Barony of Rowany, this lower cost will be passed on to the populace, taking into account that those of us who travel from the northern climes of Lochac, will now have to travel further, as indeed, will others from other parts. The shekels don’t seem to go as far these days and any help on this score, will, I am sure, be much appreciated by all.
    Yours in Service, Caterina Contarini

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>